The
Woman in Black (2012)
Is Daniel Radcliffe bigger than Harry Potter? The results of this weekend’s box office report will answer that question. From an acting standpoint, he wasn’t given much to work with in “The Woman in Black,” yet showed that he is more than capable of locking up the ol' magic wand.
Arthur
Kipps (Radcliffe), a young lawyer weighed down by financial troubles and
grieving over the death of his wife, is sent to a small, remote village with
the task of handling the estate of an old woman, who recently died. Like many other protagonists in this genre,
Arthur gets more than he signed up for. The side effects of being the main character in this film are: thousand
yard stares with the occasional verbal abuse from local villagers, being blamed
by said villagers for the mysterious deaths of their children, staying at a
creepy house surrounded by a hazardous supply of water, and being haunted by a
cranky, vengeful ghost.
Director:
James Watkins
Cast:
Daniel Radcliffe, Ciarán Hinds
Is Daniel Radcliffe bigger than Harry Potter? The results of this weekend’s box office report will answer that question. From an acting standpoint, he wasn’t given much to work with in “The Woman in Black,” yet showed that he is more than capable of locking up the ol' magic wand.
Abundant
on bleak landscapes and drenched with an overwhelming feeling of despair, this familiar
ghost story never really finds a voice to call its own. For those that are new to the horror genre,
this is a fantastic film to start with. For
seasoned horror fans, some of the running time of this film might have been
used to fantasize on the different ways your money could have been spent (I was
leaning on guitar strings). With that in
mind, I really don’t want to give the impression that this is a bad film. This is a classic ghost story dressed with
haunting visuals and a talented cast.
For
me, the scariest thing about “The Woman in Black” was the brief glimpse into
superstition and group hysteria. I wish
that the film had more of a back-story on the town and the mansion. Instead, most of the film involves Arthur
exploring dusty old rooms filled with dusty, creepy dolls. There are also pacing problems, primarily in
the middle of the film. Deviations from standard
scare tactics could have helped this.
Is it
wrong to call this film derivative? Is
familiar filmmaking necessarily a bad thing? After all, we have our own experiences and opinions that shape our
perceptions of what we call entertainment. To some this film has already been done to death. To others it might be that comforting cup of
hot chocolate on a cold winter night.
The
main thing “The Woman in Black” wants you to leave with is: grieving is not
easy. Some people decide to come back as
a ghost and make your life miserable while others might dress their pets in
clothing and sit them at the dinner table. Who am I to judge?